Build a quick screening table from funding calls before deciding which opportunities deserve deeper review.
A consultant is tracking funding calls for different clients. The documents are long, legalistic, and hard to compare at speed. Before anyone reads every appendix, Rowvia creates a screening table with provider, program, eligible applicants, activities, deadlines, cost categories, and required attachments. It does not replace expert review; it helps decide where expert review should start.
Upload funding PDFs, DOCX guidelines, related annexes, or programme URLs, use the Grant call template, and review a table where each primary call is one row by default. Related annexes or guidelines can stay with it. The result is useful for triage, prioritization, and handoff to a specialist.
Open the grant demoThe demo uses sample data. You will see how primary sources become rows by default, how related attachments can stay with them, how a template prepares columns, and how to review the result before export.
The template is designed for first-pass funding and eligibility screening:
Open template detail
Start with a prepared template for the workflow. The columns and instructions match the selected use case.
Each output column has its own instruction, so the result is structured table data instead of a loose summary. You can adjust the suggested columns or add custom ones for the fields you need.
Upload files, add URLs, or paste text. Each primary source becomes one row by default; related attachments can stay on the same row.
During processing, you can see what is done, what is waiting, and what is currently running. After completion, you can correct cells and export the table.
The demo uses synthetic file names, URLs, or text-source names and results. The same principle applies to your own primary sources; related attachments can be added to the same row.
The output is a table that works well in Excel or another review workflow. One row represents one primary source by default, related attachments can stay with it, and the columns describe the specific fields you want to extract. For grant documents, this makes it easier to compare sources side by side without manual copying.
| Source | Call title | Provider | Program | Eligible applicants | Supported activities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| innovation-fund-call.pdf | service package | Alpha Ltd | service package | stated in source | stated in source |
| research-council-grant.pdf | equipment supply | Beta GmbH | equipment supply | value to verify | value to verify |
| horizon-style-funding-call.pdf | review overview | Gamma LLC | review overview | fill after review | fill after review |
Rowvia is useful for a first structured overview, review, and export. It should not replace accounting, legal, insurance, or other expert decisions, and important values should be checked against the source document.
Ordinary OCR usually only reads text. In a grant documents workflow, the more useful result is getting values into the same columns across several sources, so they can be compared, filtered, and handed off as a table.
Yes. Rowvia prepares a review table where each primary source becomes one row by default, related attachments can stay with it, and the columns match the selected workflow.
Typical fields include Call title, Provider, Program, Eligible applicants. You can adjust the columns to match your process.
No. The output is a reviewable working table. Important legal, accounting, insurance, or compliance values should still be checked by the responsible person.
Yes. You can use a prepared template as a starting point, then adjust columns or add your own questions for the fields you need to extract.
This page is mapped to concrete long-tail queries and links onward to the matching template, pricing, or technical documentation.
Open the demo, use the related template, or compare similar document scenarios.
